HIV Databases HIV Databases home HIV Databases home
HIV sequence database

The History of HIV-1 Biological Phenotypes
Past, Present and Future

Eva Maria Fenyö, 1Hanneke Schuitemaker, 2Birgitta Åsjö, 3Jane McKeating, 4Quentin Sattentau 5 and the EC Concerted Action HIV Variability, 6

1Microbiology and Tumorbiology Center, Karolinska Institute, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
2Department of Clinical Viro Immunology, Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service and Laboratory for Experimental and Clinical Immunology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Center for Research in Virology, University of Bergen , 5020 Bergen, Norway
4Department of Microbiology, University of Reading, RG6 2AH Reading, UK
5Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy, Case 906, 13288 Marseille, France
6Active participants of the EC Concerted Action HIV Variability: Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden: EM. Fenyö Coordinator; Chester Beatty laboratories (London, United Kingdom): Robin A. Weiss, A. McKnight; University of Liverpool (Liverpool, UK): Thomas Schulz; Centre d'Immunologie de Marseille-Luminy (Marseille, France): Q. Sattentau; University of Reading (Reading, United Kingdom): J. McKeating; Univ. College and Middlesex School of Medicine (London, United Kingdom): P. Balfe; University of Bergen (Bergen, Norway): B. Å sjö Natl.Public Health Institute (Helsinki, Finland): P. Leinikki, M. Salminen; Inst. of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene (Freiburg, Germany): A. Meyerhans; Central Laboratory of the Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service (Amsterdam, The Netherlands): F. Miedema, H. Schuitemaker; Swedish Inst. for Infections Disease Control (Stockholm, Sweden): J. Albert; Instituto Nacional de Saude (Lisboa, Portugal): F. Avillez, N. Taveira; University of Padova (Padova, Italy): L. Chieco Bianchi, A. De Rossi; University of Edinburgh (Edinburgh, United Kingdom): A. Leigh Brown.

HIV-1 primary isolates have been classified according to their behavior in tissue culture into two distinct groups based on their growth kinetics, cytopathology and cellular tropism. Classification by growth kinetics and cytopathology is indicative of replication rate and syncytium induction in activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Accordingly, the terms slow/low and rapid/high for replication pattern and non-syncytium inducing (NSI) and syncytium inducing (SI) for cytopathology were introduced [1-3]. In general, the terms SI and NSI correspond broadly to the rapid/high and slow/low phenotypes, respectively [4, 5]. A currently used method to distinguish between these HIV-1 phenotypes is based on the ability of a virus to infect and induce syncytia in the MT-2 T cell line [6]. These two groups of viruses are also distinct at the genetic level, SI viruses generally have a greater positive charge within the third variable region of the envelope glycoprotein than NSI viruses [7-9]. A third phenotype is defined by tropism and includes the terms T cell tropic, macrophage-tropic, dual-tropic [10] and T cell line-adapted (TCLA, reviewed in [11, 12]). Classification of primary HIV-1 isolates by tropism is, however, not as clear a classification as by replicative capacity and cytopathology, since conflicting data exist concerning macrophage tropism of several reported HIV-1 isolates. Macrophage tropism, as defined by the ability of the virus to infect and replicate in primary monocyte/macrophage cultures has been described either as a feature of primary viruses that mostly lack T cell line tropism [13] or as a general characteristic of HIV-1 isolates [10, 14]. Another report describes tropism as a continuous spectrum, ranging from viruses that infect macrophages with high efficiency and T cell lines with very low efficiency, to the converse [15]. Clearly, more experimental data are required to clarify this point. Finally, adaptation to growth in T cell lines changes the biological properties of primary HIV-1 isolates resulting in a variety of phenotypic and genotypic changes leading to altered cellular tropism and increased sensitivity to neutralization by antibody and soluble receptor [12 ,16,17 ].
The classification of SI and NSI, which corresponds broadly to the rapid/high and slow/low phenotypes, respectively, (see Table 1) is not as simple as it first appears. For example, NSI (slow/low) viruses are able to grow as rapidly as SI (rapid/high) viruses and form syncytia in primary cultures of CD4+ T cells depleted of CD8+ T cells ([18,19 ] and unpublished results). Rapid/high viruses are similar to SI viruses in that both are able to replicate in CD4+ cell lines of monocytoid or T-cell origin, and are usually isolated from late-stage, immunodeficient patients. Yet in cases where NSI viruses are isolated from AIDS patients, these viruses grow rapidly in PBMC cultures but do not infect monocytoid or T-cell lines. However, it has to be remembered that in spite of these complicating factors, the biological properties of HIV-1 have allowed the definition of virulence markers [20-22]. A more precise definition of such phenotypic traits associated with increased HIV-1 virulence will be of importance.

 Table 1. Classification of HIV-1 biological phenotypes

                                                         previous terminology based on   
Chemokine receptor    New Classification  cytopathology in    replication rate              tropism
       usage                                 MT-2 cells           in PBMC           concept 1     concept 2

     CXCR4                    X4             syncytium-         rapid/high      T cell tropic    dual-tropic*
                                              inducing                          T cell line

     CCR5                     R5            non-syncytium-       slow/low        macrophage-      dual-tropic*
  CCR3/CCR2b                  R3/R2b        inducing                             tropic

   CXCR4&CCR5                 X4R5           syncytium-          rapid/high      T cell tropic    dual-tropic*
  and/or CCR3                 X4R5R3         inducing 

 Bonzo, Bob unclass-      yet to be         unclassified       unclassified      unknown
  ified and others         named

*Dual tropism for macrophages and lymphocytes as defined by Valentin et al. [10].
The discovery that HIV-1 uses members of the seven transmembrane domain chemokine receptor family as co-receptors for membrane fusion and entry (reviewed in [23]) has changed our perception about the properties of both T cell line-adapted and primary HIV-1 isolates. The two most well-defined HIV-1 co-receptors are CXCR4 and CCR5, members of the CXC and CC chemokine receptor subfamilies, respectively (reviewed in [24]). CXCR4 was the first HIV-1 co-receptor to be characterized, and was shown to be required for the fusion of T cell line-adapted viruses with non-human cells expressing human CD4 [25]. It is expressed on many cell types including transformed T cells, fibroblasts, primary T cells, and macrophages. Subsequently, CCR5 was shown to be the principal co-receptor for primary HIV-1 isolates with the NSI phenotype [26-3026-30], whereas the SI phenotype was associated with the use of CXCR4 alone or in combination with CCR5 [31-33]. Other members of the CC chemokine receptor family, such as CCR2b and CCR3, may also function as co-receptors for NSI virus entry, although generally in a less efficient manner than CCR5 [26 28 33]. The almost complete resistance to infection by slow/low, NSI-type viruses of individuals carrying a deletion of 32 base pairs in both alleles of the CCR5 gene confirms the importance of this molecule in HIV-1 transmission in vivo [34-36].
The previous classification systems based on replicative and syncytium inducing capacities of primary HIV-1 isolates in PBMC or MT-2 cells can be translated into classification based on co-receptor usage, thereby creating a molecular basis for defining HIV-1 biological phenotype. Thus primary and T cell line adapted HIV-1 isolates can now be grouped on the basis of co-receptor use. The classification systems presently used and their relationship to co-receptor usage are shown in Table 1. Thus viruses previously termed SI (rapid/high) which infect activated PBMC and readily infect CD4+ T cell lines are defined by their use of the CXC-chemokine receptor CXCR4. NSI (slow/low) viruses which preferentially infect activated PBMC would be defined by their use of members of the CC-chemokine receptor family, principally CCR-5. According to the terminology based on co-receptor usage, CXCR4 using viruses would be termed X4 and CCR5-using viruses R5 [37]. Viruses that were previously defined as SI (rapid/high), and which use both CXCR4 and CCR5 (and/or CCR3) receptors, would be termed X4R5 (-R3) viruses. Since novel members of the chemokine receptor family which can function as HIV co-receptors continue to be cloned and characterized [38-43] it will be important to allow room for expansion within this classification scheme. A classification system, based on the clustering of a particular virus isolate or clone by the molecules required for virus entry and virus-induced cell-cell fusion should remain a clear and flexible system for the future.
Studies in which HIV-1 envelope genes have been expressed, either in the form of recombinant glycoproteins or as infectious virus, in the presence of CD4 and the appropriate co-receptor have demonstrated that both SI and NSI viruses are equally able to induce syncytium formation. Thus the terms syncytium-inducing and non-syncytium-inducing are not absolute and may only be relevant in terms of co-receptor expression levels on target cells. Similarly, both rapid/high and slow/low viruses appear to have comparable replication kinetics in transformed cell lines expressing both CCR5 and CXCR4 together ([44] and unpublished results) or separately [33, 45]. It is becoming clear that both CD4 and chemokine receptor expression levels are important factors in determining susceptibility of cells to different viruses.
The phenotypic classification system for describing the biological properties of viral isolates continues to be used in parallel with the adaptation of the new nomenclature, and should be interpreted in the context of the underlying molecular interactions. However, many aspects of the molecular relationships relating to viral phenotype are yet to be resolved. We know today that the basis of PBMC suitability for the isolation of a wide variety of HIV isolates is that activated CD4+ T lymphocytes contain populations that express either CCR5 or CXCR4 that can be infected with viruses using either or both molecules [47,48 ]. In virus isolation cultures involving cultures with mixed donor PBMC [46], HIV-1 replication patterns still appear as slow or fast, low- or high-titre, respectively, and the level of expression of the relevant co-receptor in the PBMC cultures appears to determine the rate of replication [49]. Phenotyping viruses with the MT-2 cell line remains an efficient way of defining the SI/NSI phenotype. Similarly to other immortalized CD4+ T-cell lines, MT-2 cells express CXCR4 and are susceptible to CXCR4-using viruses. When using MT-2 cells to study viral phenotype, the assay should be indicated (for example, by specifying that the viruses are MT-2 negative or MT-2 positive), along with the more descriptive SI/NSI designation. Furthermore, the T-tropic and M-tropic classification should be used with care, such that a virus should only be called macrophage tropic when tested in primary monocyte/macrophage cultures. It is important to appreciate that classification by co-receptor utilization in cell lines expressing high levels of CD4 and co-receptors may not necessarily indicate that such viruses will use these co-receptors to infect primary resting cells in vivo. Thus, until a more complete understanding of the molecular basis for tropism is attained, we suggest that viruses should be classified according to the experimental system employed, in conjunction with the second receptor utilization patterns.

Acknowledgments This work was completed with help of EC grants from the Concerted Action ``HIV Variability'' and Programme EVA.


1. Åsjö, B., L. Morfeldt-Månson, J. Albert, G. Biberfeld, A. Karlsson, K. Lidman, and E.M. Fenyö, Replicative capacity of human immunodeficiency virus from patients with varying severity of HIV infection. Lancet, 1986. ii 660-662.

2. Fenyö, E.M., L. Morfeldt-Månson, F. Chiodi, A. Lind, A. von Gegerfelt, J. Albert, E. Olausson, and B. Åsjö, Distinct replicative and cytopathic characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus isolates. J Virol, 1988.62 4414-4419.

3. Tersmette, M., R.E.Y. De Goede, B.J. Al, I. Winkel, B. Gruters, H.T. Cuypers, H.G. Huisman, and F. Miedema, Differential syncytium-inducing capacity of human immunodeficiency virus isolates: frequent detection of syncytium-inducing isolates in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and AIDS-related complex. J Virol, 1988.62 2026-2032.

4. Miedema, F., L. Meyaard, M. Koot, M.R. Klein, M.T.L. Roos, M. Groenink, R.A.M. Fouchier, A.B. Van't Wout, M. Tersmette, P.T.A. Schellekens, and H. Schuitemaker, Changing virus-host interactions in the course of HIV-1 infection. Immunological Reviews, 1994.140 35-72.

5. Ruebsamen-Waigmann, H., H. von Briesen, H. Holmes, Å. Björndal, B. Korber, R. Esser, S. Ranjbar, P. Tomlinson, B. Galvao-Castro, E. Karita, S. Sempala, C. Wasi, S. Osmanov, E.M. Fenyö, and the WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization, Standard conditions of virus isolation reveal biological variability of HIV-1 in different regions of the world. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1994.10 1401-1408.

6. Koot, M., A.H.V. Vos, R.P.M. Keet, R.E.Y. de Goede, W. Dercksen, F.G. Terpstra, R.A. Coutinho, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette, HIV-1 biological phenotype in long-term infected individuals evaluated with an MT-2 cocultivation assay. AIDS, 1992.6 49-54.

7. Fouchier, R.A.M., M. Groenink, N.A. Kootstra, M. Tersmette, H.G. Huisman, F. Miedema, and H. Schuitemaker, Phenotype-associated sequence variation in the third variable domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 molecule. J Virol, 1992.66 3183-3187.

8. de Jong, J.-J., A. de Ronde, W. Keulen, M. Tersmette, and J. Goudsmit, Minimal requirements for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 V3 domain to support the syncytium-inducing phenotype: analysis by single amino acid substitution. J Virol, 1992.66 6777-6780.

9. de Wolf, F., E. Hogervorst, J. Goudsmit, E.M. Fenyö, H. Ruebsamen-Waigmann, H. Holmes, B. Galvao-Castro, E. Karita, S.D.K. Sempala, C. Wasi, E. Baan, F. Zorgdrager, V. Lukashov, S. Osmanov, C. Kuiken, M. Cornelissen, and the WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization, Syncytium-inducing (SI) and non-syncytium inducing (NSI) capacity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes other than B: Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, 1994.10 1387-1400.

10. Valentin, A., J. Albert, R. Fredriksson, E.M. Fenyö, and B. Å sjö, Dual tropism for lymphocytes and mononuclear phagocytes is a common feature of primary HIV-isolates. J Virol, 1994.68 6684-6689.

11. Levy, J.A., HIV and the pathogenesis of AIDS. 1994, Washington DC: ASM Press.

12. Moore, J.P. and D.D. Ho, HIV-1 neutralization: the consequences of viral adaptation to growth on transformed T cells. AIDS, 1995. 9(suppl A):S117-S136.

13. Schuitemaker, H., M. Koot, N.A. Koostra, M.W. Dercksen, R.E.Y. De Goede, R.P. Van Steenwijk, J.M. Lange, J.K. Eeftink Schattenkerk, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette, Biological phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones at different stages of infection: progression of disease is associated with a shift from monocytotropic to T-cell-tropic virus populations. J Virol, 1992.66 1354-1360.

14. Stent, G., G.-B. Joo, P. Kierulf, and B. Å sjö, Macrophage tropism: fact or fiction? Journal of Leukocyte Biology, 1997.62 4-11.

15. Collin, M., P. Illei, W. James, and S. Gordon, Definition of the range and distribution of human immunodeficiency virus macrophage tropism using PCR-based infectivity measurements. J Gen Virol, 1994.75 1597-1603.

16. Sullivan, N., Y. Sun, J. Li, W. Hofmann, and J. Sodroski, Replicative function and neutralization sensitivity of envelope glycoproteins from primary and T-cell line-passaged human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates. J Virol, 1995.69 4413-4422.

17. Zhang, Y.-j., R. Fredriksson, J. McKeating, and E.M. Fenyö, Passage of HIV-1 molecular clones into different cell lines confers differential sensitivity to neutralization. Virology, 1997.238 254-264.

18. Todd, B.J., P. Kedar, and J.H. Pope, Syncytium induction in primary CD4+ T-cell lines from normal donors by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates with non-syncytium-inducing genotype and phenotype in MT-2 cells. J Virol, 1995.69 7099-7105.

19. Tanaka, Y., Y. Koyanagi, R. Tanaka, Y. Kumazawa, T. Nishimura, and N. Yamamoto, Productive and lytic infection of human CD4+ type 1 helper T cells with macrophage-tropic human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol, 199771 465-470.

20. Cheng-Mayer, C., D. Seto, M. Tateno, and J.A. Levy, Biological features of HIV-1 that correlate with virulence in the host. Science, 1988.240 80-82.

21. Tersmette, M., B.A. Gruters, F. de Wolf, R.E.Y. de Goede, J.M.A. Lange, P.T.A. Schellekens, J. Goudsmit, H.G. Huisman, and F. Miedema, Evidence for a role of virulent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) variants in the pathogenesis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: studies on sequential isolates. J Virol, 1989.63 2118-2125.

22. Fiore, J.R., Å. Björndal, K. Aperia-Peipke, M. Di Stefano, G. Angarano, G. Pastore, H. Gaines, E.M. Fenyö, and J. Albert, The biological phenotype of HIV-1 is usually retained during and after sexual transmission. Virology, 1994.204 297-303.

23. D'Souza, M.P. and V.A. Harden, Chemokines and HIV-1 second receptors. Nature Medicine, 1996.2 1293-1300.

24. Moser, B., Chemokines and HIV: a remarkable synergism. Trends Microbiol. 1997.5(3) 88-90.

25. Feng, Y., C.C. Broder, P.E. Kennedy, and E.A. Berger, HIV-1 entry cofactor: functional cDNA cloning of a seven-transmembrane, G protein-coupled receptor. Science, 1996.272 872-877.

26. Choe, H., M. Farzan, Y. Sun, N. Sullivan, B. Rollins, P.D. Ponath, L.J. Wu, C.R. Mackay, G. Larosa, W. Newman, N. Gerard, C. Gerard, and J. Sodroski, The beta-chemokine receptor CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell, 1996.85 1135-1148.

27. Deng, H.K., R. Liu, W. Ellmeier, S. Choe, D. Unutmaz, M. Burkhart, P. Dimarzio, S. Marmon, R.E. Sutton, C.M. Hill, C.B. Davis, S.C. Peiper, T.J. Schall, D.R. Littman, and N.R. Landau, Identification of a major co-receptor for primary isolates of HIV-1. Nature, 1996.381 661-666.

28. Doranz, B.J., J. Rucker, Y.J. Yi, R.J. Smyth, M. Samson, S.C. Peiper, M. Parmentier, R.G. Collman, and R.W. Doms, A dual-tropic primary hiv-1 isolate that uses fusin and the beta-chemokine receptors ckr-5, ckr-3, and ckr-2b as fusion cofactors. Cell, 1996.85 1149-1158.

29. Dragic, T., V. Litwin, G.P. Allaway, S.R. Martin, Y.X. Huang, K.A. Nagashima, C. Cayanan, P.J. Maddon, R.A. Koup, J.P. Moore, and W.A. Paxton, HIV-1 entry into CD4(+) cells is mediated by the chemokine receptor CC-CKR-5. Nature, 1996.381 667-673.

30. Alkhatib, G., C. Combadiere, C.C. Broder, Y. Feng, P.E. Kennedy, P.M. Murphy, and E.A. Berger, CC CKRs - A rantes, MIP-1-alpha, MIP-1-beta receptor as a fusion cofactor for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. Science, 1996.272 1955-1958.

31. Simmons, G., D. Wilkinson, J.D. Reeves, M.T. Dittmar, S. Beddows, J. Weber, G. Carnegie, U. Desselberger, P.W. Gray, R.A. Weiss, and P.R. Clapham, Primary, syncytium-inducing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates are dual-tropic and most can use either Lestr or CCR5 as co-receptors for virus entry. J Virol, 1996.70 8355-8360.

32. Zhang, L., Y. Huang, T. He, Y. Cao, and D.D. Ho, HIV-1 subtype and second receptor use. Nature, 1996.383 768.

33. Björndal, Å., H. Deng, M. Jansson, J.R. Fiore, C. Colognesi, A. Karlsson, J. Albert, G. Scarlatti, D.R. Littman, and E.M. Fenyö, Co-receptor usage of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates varies according to biological phenotype. J Virol, 1997.71 7478-7487.

34. Paxton, W.A., S.R. Martin, D. Tse, T.R. O'Brien, J. Skurnick, N.L. VanDevanter, N. Padian, J.F. Braun, D.P. Kotler, S.M. Wolinsky, and R.A. Koup, Relative resistance to HIV-1 infection of CD4 lymphocytes from persons who remain uninfected despite multiple high-risk sexual exposures. Nature Medicine, 1996.2 412-417.

35. Liu, R., W.A. Paxton, S. Choe, D. Ceradini, S.R. Martin, R. Horuk, M.E. MacDonald, H. Stuhlman, R.A. Koup, and N.R. Landau, Homozygous defect in HIV-1 coreceptor accounts for resistance of some multiply-exposed individuals to HIV-1 infection. Cell, 1996.86 367-377.

36. Samson, M., F. Libert, B.J. Doranz, J. Rucker, C. Liesnard, C.-M. Farber, S. Saragosti, C. Lapouméroulie, J. Cognaux, C. Forceille, G. Muyldermans, C. Verhofstede, G. Burtonboy, M. Georges, T. Imai, S. Rana, Y. Yi, R.J. Smyth, R.G. Collman, R.W. Doms, G. Vassart, and M. Parmentier, Resistance to HIV-1 infection in Caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature, 1996.382 722-725.

37. Berger, E.A., R.W. Doms, E.M. Fenyö, B.T.M. Korber, D.R. Littman, J.P. Moore, Q.J. Sattentau, H. Schuitemaker, J. Sodroski, and R.A. Weiss, HIV-1 phenotypes classified by Co-receptor usage. Nature, 1998.391 240.

38. Pleskoff, O., C. Trébute, A. Brelot, N. Heveker, M. Seman, and M. Alizon, Identification of a chemokine receptor encoded by human Cytomegalovirus as a cofactor for HIV-1 entry. Science, 1997.276 1874-1878.

39. Reeves, J.D., A. McKnight, S. Potempa, G. Simmons, P.W. Gray, C.A. Power, T. Wells, R.A. Weiss, and S.J. Talbot, CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 (ROD/B): Use of the 7-transmembrane receptors CXCR-4, CCR3, and V28 for entry. Virology, 1997.231 130-134.

40. Alkhatib, G., F. Liao, E.A. Berger, and J.M. Farber, A new SIV co-receptor, STRL33. Nature, 1997.388 238.

41. Deng, H., D. Unutmaz, V.N. KewalRamani, and D.R. Littman, Expression cloning of new receptors used by simian and human immunodeficiency viruses. Nature, 1997.388 296-300.

42. Clapham, P.R. and R.A. Weiss, Immunodeficiency viruses. Spoilt for choice of co-receptors. Nature, 1997.388 230-231.

43. Loetscher, D.F., D.F. Amara, D.F. Oberlin, D.F. Brass, and D.F. Legler, TYMSTR, a putative chemokine receptor selectively expressed in activated T cells, exhibits HIV-1 co-receptor function. Curr Biol, 1997.7 652-660.

44. Lusso, P., F. Cocchi, C. Balotta, P.D. Markham, A. Louie, P. Farci, R. Pal, R.C. Gallo, and M.S. Reitz, Growth of macrophage-tropic and primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates in a unique CD4+ T-cell clone (PM1): Failure to downregulate CD4 and to interfere with cell-line-tropic HIV-1. J Virol, 1995.69 3712-3720.

45. Scarlatti, G., E. Tresoldi, Å. Björndal, R. Fredriksson, C. Colognesi, H. Deng, M.S. Malnati, A. Plebani, A.G. Siccardi, D.R. Littman, and P. Lusso, in vivo evolution of HIV-1 coreceptor usage and sensitivity to chemokine-mediated suppression. Nature Medicine, 1997.3 1259-1265.

46. World, Health, and Organization, WHO Guidelines for standard HIV isolation procedures. 1994, WHO/GPA/VAD.

47. Bleul, C.C., L. Wu, J.A. Hoxie, T.A. Springer, and C.R. Mackay, The HIV co-receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 are differentially expressed and regulated on human T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1997.94 1925-1930.

48. Wu, L., W.A. Paxton, N. Kassam, N. Ruffing, J.B. Rottman, N. Sullivan, H. Choe, J. Sodroski, W. Newman, R.A. Koup, and C.R. Mackay, CCR5 levels and expression pattern correlate with infectability by macrophage-tropic HIV-1, in vitro. J Exp Med, 1997.185 1681-1691.

49. Bleul, C.C., M. Farzan, H. Choe, C. Parolin, I. Clark-Lewis, J. Sodroski, and T.A. Springer, The lymphocyte chemoattractant SDF-1 is a ligand for LESTR/fusin and blocks HIV-1 entry. Nature, 1996.382 829-833.

last modified: Tue Aug 31 13:54 2010

Questions or comments? Contact us at

Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration
Copyright © 2005-2012 LANS LLC All rights reserved | Disclaimer/Privacy

Dept of Health & Human Services Los Alamos National Institutes of Health